Monday, February 16, 2015

"Special for" v. "special to": 3 to 6 or 16 to 14?

On a quick break between a family emergency and tests, I ran a few searches on the Compleat LexTutor site for phrases that someone had asked about at the PIGATE gathering on Sat., Feb. 14.

In a mega corpus of approx. 3 million words, here's what I found:
The mega corpus is approx. 2/3 British National Corpus (BNC: written + spoken).


A couple of bigger, slower searches of the BNC plus the larger Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), approx. 14 million words in all, gave different results:

  • "Special" with "for" within a few words and words that repeat 1 word to the right of special:
    • for=16, interest=3, provisions=3, time=3, ...
  • "Special" with "to" within a few words and words that repeat 1 word to the right of special
    • to=14, interest=11, issue=10, attention=6, access=3, effort=3, permission=3, prosecutor=3, reference=3, way=3, ...

Though convenient findings like these may be inconclusive, since they don't directly compare the BNC to the COCA, perhaps the author of the textbook passage in question was inclined toward British usage. [As I recall, the next word after "for" or "to" was a pronoun ("special * her"?). Anyone keen to dig into that?]

[243 words]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your interest in the PIGATE blog! We are starting off with comment moderation ON, so there may be delays in comment displays. However, we will try to approve your comments as soon as possible–hopefully in no longer than a day. If you also are interested in becoming a blog contributor, please spell out in a comment a topic or two that you'd like to blog about. Thanks in advance for commenting–and becoming a regular contributor!